Environmental Journalism: Covering Climate Change and Beyond

From climate change to conservation, environmental journalism is more important than ever. Learn how to report on the planet’s biggest challenges.

---

If you’ve ever scrolled through the news and thought, Is everything on fire?, you’re not alone. From record-breaking heat waves to vanishing coastlines, the climate crisis isn’t looming—it’s here. And yet, despite the urgency, environmental journalism has never been more challenging.

Covering climate change and environmental issues means navigating a minefield of misinformation, political spin, and corporate greenwashing. Fossil fuel companies rebrand as eco-friendly, lawmakers debate whether facts are partisan, and social media amplifies both groundbreaking research and conspiracy theories in equal measure.

So, where do journalists fit in? Right at the center—translating complex science into compelling stories, holding industries accountable, and making sure the world pays attention. It’s not easy, but if you’re up for the challenge, there’s never been a more important time to tell these stories.

The expanding scope of environmental journalism

The best environmental journalism goes far beyond climate change—it’s about connecting the dots between science, policy, business, and human impact. As the stakes grow, so does the range of stories journalists need to tell.

• Climate change and extreme weather: When heatwaves shut down airports and wildfires turn the sky orange over New York, environmental stories aren’t just for scientists—they’re front-page news. Journalists need to translate the science behind emissions, sustainability, and the fossil fuel industry into reporting that informs and engages.

• Pollution and resource depletion: Air pollution isn’t just a problem in far-off megacities—it’s affecting major hubs from Los Angeles to London. Stories about water crises, toxic landfills, and the microplastics we’re all (unfortunately) eating have made environmental reporting a public health necessity.

• Biodiversity loss: The Amazon is burning, coral reefs are dying, and conservationists are racing to save species from extinction. Environmental journalists cover not just the damage, but the people and policies working toward solutions.

• Environmental justice: Climate change doesn’t affect everyone equally. Low-income communities and marginalized groups often bear the brunt of pollution, extreme weather, and corporate negligence. Investigative journalism plays a key role in exposing these inequities.

• Corporate accountability and investigative journalism: Who’s really funding deforestation? Which companies are “going green” in marketing but not in practice? Following the money behind environmental destruction is one of the most important (and underreported) areas in journalism today.

• Policy and regulation: Government decisions shape everything from emissions standards to public transit funding. Reporting on environmental policy—from global climate accords to city-level sustainability initiatives—helps hold leaders accountable.

• Intersection with business and tech: Renewable energy, electric vehicles, carbon offsets—environmental journalism isn’t just about problems; it’s about innovations. Following the business of sustainability is just as critical as tracking environmental disasters.

Navigating barriers in environmental reporting

Covering the environment isn’t just about reporting on melting ice caps or deforestation—it’s about confronting powerful industries, political roadblocks, and misinformation campaigns designed to keep the public in the dark. Environmental journalists need to be relentless in their pursuit of the truth while making complex science accessible.

Here are the biggest challenges in the field—and how to work around them.

1. Getting access to reliable data

Governments, corporations, and industry lobbyists don’t always make environmental data easy to find. Reports on pollution levels, deforestation rates, and greenhouse gas emissions are often buried under bureaucratic red tape or deliberately withheld.

• Journalists must dig through public records, satellite imagery, and leaked documents to piece together the full story.

• Tools like FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) requests, scientific databases, and environmental watchdog groups can help uncover hidden data.

• Collaborating with researchers and nonprofit organizations can provide access to independent studies that corporate interests can’t manipulate.

2. Legal and political risks

Exposing environmental corruption, illegal logging, or corporate pollution isn’t just difficult—it can be dangerous. Reporters have been sued, threatened, and even imprisoned for investigating powerful industries.

• Governments in regions like Africa and Latin America have cracked down on journalists uncovering environmental destruction linked to major corporations.

• Strategic partnerships with international news organizations provide added protection, ensuring that no story disappears if a journalist is silenced.

• Understanding media law and working with legal defense groups like the Committee to Protect Journalists can be essential when reporting on controversial environmental issues.

3. Turning complex science into engaging stories

A common challenge in environmental journalism is making scientific research digestible for a general audience without oversimplifying key details.

• Readers don’t want to sift through dense climate reports, but they do care about how rising temperatures affect their homes, jobs, and communities.

• The best environmental journalists act as translators, turning scientific jargon into compelling narratives that connect with people’s everyday lives.

• Developing relationships with scientists, ecologists, and public policy experts can help ensure accuracy while avoiding misleading conclusions.

4. Fighting misinformation and climate denial

Fossil fuel companies and political interest groups have spent decades muddying the waters of climate science, funding misleading studies and pushing false narratives. Social media has only made this problem worse.

• Fact-checking and sourcing are more critical than ever—journalists must scrutinize where data comes from and investigate who funds scientific studies.

• Avoiding false balance is key: giving equal weight to climate denial arguments alongside legitimate science only adds to public confusion.

• Exposing the financial and political ties behind misinformation campaigns helps readers understand why certain narratives are being pushed.

5. Balancing urgency with solutions

The climate crisis is overwhelming, and constant coverage of disasters, deforestation, and extinction can leave audiences feeling helpless. But focusing solely on the doom-and-gloom side of the story makes people tune out.

• Solutions-driven journalism highlights efforts that are working—renewable energy innovations, conservation successes, and policies that make a difference.

• Readers are more likely to engage when stories show both the risks and the ways individuals, governments, and businesses are tackling them.

• Interviews with local communities, scientists, and activists can add a hopeful perspective without downplaying the urgency of the issues at hand.

Environmental journalism is one of the most challenging beats in the industry—but it’s also one of the most important. Journalists willing to tackle these obstacles head-on can help shape public understanding, hold the powerful accountable, and inspire real-world change.

What sets great environmental journalists apart?

Not all environmental journalism is created equal. Some reporters regurgitate press releases about a company’s “commitment to sustainability” (while conveniently ignoring its track record of dumping chemicals into local rivers). Others expose illegal deforestation rings, reveal corporate greenwashing, and break stories that lead to policy changes. The best environmental journalists don’t just report on climate change—they shape the conversation around it.

So, what sets them apart?

1. They have a sixth sense for credible sources

In an era where misinformation spreads faster than a California wildfire, environmental journalists need a finely tuned B.S. detector. This means vetting sources carefully and knowing where to look beyond the usual press statements.

• Scientists and researchers: The backbone of solid environmental reporting. Journalists should cultivate relationships with climate scientists, marine biologists, and ecologists to ensure their stories are grounded in facts, not fear-mongering.

• Activists and NGOs: Groups like Greenpeace, the Sierra Club, and local environmental organizations often have insider knowledge of unfolding crises and corporate wrongdoing.

• Policymakers and whistleblowers: Government officials, industry insiders, and anonymous sources can provide crucial leaks and behind-the-scenes insights—though verifying their claims is critical.

• Indigenous and local communities: Some of the best environmental reporting comes from those on the frontlines of deforestation, water shortages, and land rights battles.

2. They use investigative techniques to follow the money

Great environmental journalism isn’t just about reporting on melting ice caps—it’s about uncovering who profits from the destruction and who’s covering it up.

• Tracking corporate influence: Investigating lobbying efforts, campaign donations, and PR tactics that push climate misinformation.

• Analyzing supply chains: The “eco-friendly” fashion brand? It might be sourcing cotton from water-depleted regions and dumping dye into rivers.

• Using open-source intelligence (OSINT): Satellite imagery, shipping records, and leaked documents often reveal what corporations and governments don’t want the public to know.

A prime example: The 2021 Pulitzer Prize-winning story by BuzzFeed News that used satellite data and witness testimony to expose China’s vast network of internment camps in Xinjiang—proving how satellite imagery can be a game-changer in investigative journalism.

3. They make data work for them

A good environmental journalist isn’t just a storyteller—they’re also a data detective. Climate change, pollution, and deforestation all leave a digital footprint, and knowing how to analyze and interpret data can turn an ordinary story into a groundbreaking one.

• Tracking emissions: The best reporters can decipher carbon offset claims, emissions reports, and sustainability pledges to see which ones actually hold up.

• Investigating environmental science research: Reading (and translating) dense scientific studies into engaging, understandable stories is a critical skill.

• Spotting statistical manipulation: Corporations love to cherry-pick data to make their practices look greener than they are. Journalists need to break down the numbers and expose misleading claims.

4. They turn complex issues into captivating narratives

Let’s face it: “Global emissions increased by 2% last year” isn’t exactly riveting. But what if that statistic is framed around how rising temperatures could make coffee more expensive or how a single company’s pollution is wiping out an entire fishing community’s livelihood?

The best environmental journalists know how to turn dry data into compelling stories:

• Human-driven storytelling: Personal narratives from farmers, firefighters, and frontline workers make abstract issues feel immediate.

• Visual storytelling: Maps, satellite images, and data visualizations help readers grasp the scale of environmental issues.

• Multimedia platforms: Podcasts, short documentaries, and interactive digital stories make environmental journalism more engaging and accessible.

5. They learn from the best

From investigative exposés on corporate greenwashing to deep dives into biodiversity loss, award-winning environmental journalism provides a blueprint for aspiring reporters.

• Pulitzer Prize-winning stories: The New York Times’ investigation into the Trump administration’s environmental rollbacks, or InsideClimate News’ groundbreaking exposé on ExxonMobil’s decades-long climate deception.

• SEJ (Society of Environmental Journalists): A go-to resource for training, workshops, and networking.

• International voices: Environmental crises don’t stop at borders. Following leading journalists in Europe, Mexico, the Middle East, and beyond ensures a well-rounded global perspective.

Getting hired, getting paid

So, you want to be an environmental journalist? Fantastic. The world needs more people investigating oil spills, tracking climate policies, and asking corporations very uncomfortable questions. But before you start sharpening your investigative skills, you’ll need to answer two big questions: Where do environmental journalists work? And how do they get paid?

1. Freelancing vs. newsroom roles

Environmental journalists work in a mix of traditional and independent roles. While newsrooms offer stability, freelancing provides more flexibility and earning potential—if you know where to pitch. Nonprofit organizations and advocacy groups also offer funding for in-depth investigative work.

• Newsroom jobs: Major outlets like The Guardian, The Washington Post, and The New York Times have climate desks, while nonprofit organizations like InsideClimate News and Mongabay fund in-depth environmental reporting. These roles offer stability, access to investigative resources, and editorial support, but competition is fierce.

• Freelancing: Many environmental journalists work independently, pitching stories to a range of outlets. While freelancing offers more control over environmental topics and potentially higher per-piece pay, it requires constant pitching, strong time management, and multiple income streams.

• Nonprofits and advocacy groups: Organizations like ProPublica, the Pulitzer Center, and 350.org hire journalists for investigative projects, research reports, and policy-focused writing. These roles often involve long-term funding and in-depth coverage of environmental issues.

2. Breaking into the beat

Editors at The Guardian, NPR, and National Geographic look for stories that go beyond broad climate coverage. Successful pitches should:

• Offer a fresh angle: Instead of general climate change coverage, focus on specific consequences, overlooked regions, or untold impacts.

• Show urgency: What’s happening now? Why does this story matter today?

• Include human voices: Environmental issues are most powerful when framed through personal stories.

• Highlight solutions: Reporting on climate disasters alone can overwhelm readers; showing progress and innovation through solutions journalism keeps them engaged.

One of the biggest hurdles for freelancers is knowing where to pitch—and which publications actually pay well. That’s why we created “220+ Publications That Pay $1 a Word“—a curated resource listing high-paying publications across news, science, environmental, and investigative journalism.

Whether you’re looking for a climate-focused magazine or a major news outlet that values in-depth reporting, this list helps you pitch smarter and get paid fairly.

3. Salaries and funding models

Financial sustainability in environmental journalism depends on where you work and how you structure your income.

• Newsroom salaries: Entry-level reporters earn $40K–$60K, while experienced journalists at major outlets can make $60K–$100K.

• Freelance pay: Standard rates range from $0.50–$1 per word, with investigative features commanding $2K–$10K per story. Corporate and NGO work often pays $1–$3 per word.

• Grants and fellowships: Organizations like SEJ, the Pulitzer Center, and the Knight Science Journalism Program fund investigative work.

• Subscription and crowdfunding Models: Platforms like Substack and Patreon allow journalists to build a paying audience and work independently.

• Speaking engagements and consulting: Many journalists earn additional income through public speaking, panel discussions, and workshops.

4. Building an audience

Having your own audience is one of the best ways to gain independence and create additional income streams. Freelancers who develop a strong online presence often have an easier time securing assignments and funding, as editors and grant committees recognize their reach and engagement.

• Social media (Twitter/X, LinkedIn): These platforms are crucial for networking, sharing work, and staying connected with experts in the field. Many journalists break stories here before they’re published.

• Newsletters (Substack, Ghost): Direct-to-reader newsletters allow journalists to fund their work through subscriptions while maintaining editorial freedom.

• Podcasts and YouTube: Many environmental reporters expand into audio and video storytelling, reaching new audiences and building credibility outside of traditional environmental news media.

Environmental journalism is evolving—here’s how to stay ahead

As climate and environmental issues become more urgent, the demand for investigative, science-based, and solutions-driven reporting is only growing. But telling these stories isn’t just about writing articles anymore—podcasts, multimedia, and data journalism are changing how reporters engage audiences. Schools, journalism organizations, and networks like the Society of Environmental Journalists and the Center for Environmental Journalism are helping shape the next generation of environmental reporters.

But the biggest challenge? Getting paid well for this work. Too many talented journalists end up underpaid, simply because they don’t know where to pitch.

That’s why we created “220+ Publications That Pay $1 a Word”—a carefully curated list of outlets that actually value quality environmental journalism. If you want to write about the planet and get paid fairly for it, start here.